- Catherine
Subnet manager of switch, subnet manager of OFED, UFM, is there any difference in the number of management nodes of them? Which one is more suitable for clients to choose when deploying?
Harry Collins
Answered on 3:31 am
The switch subnet manager, the OFED subnet manager, and UFM are software that are used to initialize and manage switches and hosts in the InfiniBand network. Their main difference lies in where they run and the scope of their functions.
The switch subnet manager is software that runs on the switch itself. It can automatically discover and configure devices in the network and provide basic network monitoring and diagnostic functions. It does not require additional management nodes, but it also does not support advanced network optimization and security functions.
The OFED subnet manager is software that runs on the host. It can use the subnet management service provided by OpenSM or Mellanox OFED. It can run on multiple hosts, achieving subnet manager redundancy and load balancing. It supports some advanced network functions, such as adaptive routing and congestion control, but it also does not support network security and preventive maintenance functions.
UFM is software that runs on dedicated management nodes. It is NVIDIA’s unified network management platform. It can monitor and manage the InfiniBand network comprehensively, supporting various advanced network functions, such as adaptive routing, congestion control, network security, preventive maintenance, performance analysis, etc. It requires at least one management node and a UFM license.
Which one is more suitable for customers to choose depends on their needs and budgets. If customers only need basic network functions and do not want to add extra management nodes, they can choose the switch subnet manager. If customers need some advanced network functions and already have host nodes, they can choose the OFED subnet manager. If customers need the most comprehensive and advanced network functions and are willing to invest in dedicated management nodes and UFM licenses, they can choose UFM.
People Also Ask
Related Articles
800G SR8 and 400G SR4 Optical Transceiver Modules Compatibility and Interconnection Test Report
Version Change Log Writer V0 Sample Test Cassie Test Purpose Test Objects：800G OSFP SR8/400G OSFP SR4/400G Q112 SR4. By conducting corresponding tests, the test parameters meet the relevant industry standards,
QSFP112 Price Guide 2026: 400G Module Costs, Cost Per Port and Volume Tiering
The same 400G DR4 optic can sell for around $500 from a factory-direct supplier and more than $1,400 from some vendor list price channels. Four price points, one standard, and
QSFP112 Compatibility Guide: Switches, NICs and CMIS
Priya spent most of a Tuesday morning troubleshooting a link that should have taken four minutes to bring up. She inserted a 400G QSFP112 module into an older leaf switch
QSFP112 Module Types: VR4, SR4, DR4, FR4 and LR4 Compared
Send a request for “a 400G QSFP112 module” to three different vendors and you may receive three different recommendations. One vendor may quote a DR4. Another may suggest a DR4+. A
QSFP112 vs OSFP: Choosing the Right 400G Form Factor
At first glance, QSFP112 and OSFP look like two competing form factors for high-speed networking. Both appear in 400G systems, both support PAM4 signaling, and both are widely used in
QSFP112 Transceiver: Complete 400G Guide (2026)
Ask five network engineers whether they should deploy QSFP112 or QSFP-DD for a 400G network, and you may get five different answers. Both form factors can support 400G, both are
QSFP112 NVIDIA AI Clusters: ConnectX-7 and BlueField-3
You cannot directly install a QSFP112 transceiver into an NVIDIA Quantum-2 or Spectrum-4 switch port. These switch platforms use OSFP-based cages, while QSFP112 is designed primarily for NVIDIA adapter-side and